Flux DAO 提案 2 摘要：“Flux V2新公链部署"
Flux DAO Proposal 2 Summary: "Flux V2 New Public Chain Deployment"
“Flux V2新公链部署" 提案摘要
"Flux V2 New Public Chain Deployment" Proposal Summary
The reconstruction of Flux V2 has basically been completed, and now it is necessary to expand the public chain deployment from the original Heco chain to the new public chain. Currently, the available public chains are BSC, Polygon, OEC, Conflux, Arbitrum, and ETH.
Flux团队通过对可选公链基础情况、公链Swap发展情况、使用群体及TVL情况等因素对比、筛选，提议 Flux V2 第一步先扩展部署BSC公链，第二步部署Polygon公链，第三步部署Arbitrum公链。
The Flux team compared and selected factors such as the basic situation of the optional public chain, the development of the public chain swap, the use group and the TVL situation. Then Flux team proposed that Flux V2 will first expand the deployment of the BSC public chain, while the second step will be deployed the Polygon public chain. The last step will be deployed the Arbitrum public chain.
The team's brief analysis of each public chain is as follows:
BSC: The TVL of swaps such as pancakeswap, Mdex, Babyswap is relatively high, and the depth of each LP is also relatively good, which can support the functions of Flux V2, the international community and users have a high Web3 foundation. Also, Flux’s mass base and previous linkages with other projects are very rich, which is recommended to deploy first.
Polygon：swap TVL比较高，深度也比较好，能够支撑Flux V2的功能，Flux在polygon的基础相对于比较差，综合对比相对于BSC略显不足，建议第二步部署。
Polygon: The swap TVL is relatively high and the depth is relatively good, which can support the function of Flux V2. The foundation of Flux in polygon is relatively poor, and the comprehensive comparison is slightly insufficient compared to BSC, which is recommended to deploy in the second step.
Arbitrum: The swap depth is slightly lower than that of BSC and Polygon, but better than others. The depth of a single LP can be used. If USDC/WETH depth is 20 million US dollars, FLux V2 can be supported. However, there are not many applications of Arbitruam, and the community needs to be pioneered. The advantage is the opportunity for the rise of the public chain in the future, which is recommended to deploy in the third step.
OEC：Cherryswap、Jswap等swap TVL比较低，各个LP深度比较差，不足以支撑Flux V2的杠杆借贷，非常容易出现重大应用上的问题，参与的用户风险出现可能资产降低的情况，目前不建议部署。
OEC: The swap TVL of Cherryswap, Jswap, etc. is relatively low, and the depth of each LP is relatively poor, which is not enough to support the leveraged lending of Flux V2. It is very prone to major application problems. The risk of participating users may reduce the assets, which is not recommended to deploy at this time .
Conflux：swap的 TVL比较低，单个LP的深度比较差，不足以支撑Flux V2的杠杆借贷，非常容易出现重大应用上的问题，参与的用户有较高的风险出现可能资产降低的情况，目前不建议部署。
Conflux: The TVL of swap is relatively low, and the depth of a single LP is relatively poor, which is not enough to support the leveraged lending of Flux V2. It is very prone to major application problems. Participating users have a higher risk of possible asset reduction, which is recommended to deploy.
Ethereum: It can be from TVL to a single LP depth, but the mass base is insufficient, and the cost of GAS is high, which is not recommended to deploy so far.
This proposal will be voted as follows according to the team’s recommended settings:
Option: Agree with the proposal: Flux V2 will be deployed on BSC first, and then deployed on public chains such as Polygon and Arbitrum.
Option: Disagree with the proposal.